Criticisms of Psychology
One of the main criticisms of psychology often roots from the insight that it is a "fuzzy" science. Thomas Kuhn’s, a philosopher in 1962 critiqued that psychology was overall in a pre-paradigm state. According to him, it lacked the agreement on overarching theory which is present in mature sciences such as chemistry and physics. Psychologists and philosophers have addressed the issue psychology criticism is different ways. Read on to know more about criticisms of psychology.
Some fields of psychology depend on research methods like surveys and questionnaires. Critics of psychology assert it to be not an objective science. According to them, other phenomena such as personality, thinking, and emotion, cannot be measured directly. Criticizing psychology, they believe that the results are often inferred from subjective self-reports, which may be problematic.
Moving on with the subject of criticisms of psychology, studies have revealed that many psychologists often confuse statistical significance with practical importance. Misuse of hypothesis-testing occurring in psychology by psychologists is common, especially by those without doctoral training in experimental psychology and statistics.
Psychology criticism implies that statistically significant are common with large samples but these have no practical importance. Some psychologists have responded to these criticisms of psychology by increasing the use of effect size statistics. Sometimes the disputes arise from within psychology, for instance, the laboratory-oriented researchers and practitioners such as clinicians. the recent years, particularly in the U.S., there has been increasing discussion over the nature of therapeutic efficiency and about the significance of empirically studying the psychotherapeutic strategies.
Critics of psychology state that some therapies are based on discredited theories and are not supported by empirical evidence. The other side of psychology criticism points to fresh research which suggests that all mainstream therapies are of about equal success. But the debate goes on that controlled studies often do not take into thought the real-world conditions.
Criticizing psychology, some observers recognize a gap between scientific theory and its application. Similar points concerning the experimental study of behavior have also been made. Critics of psychology believe that although there has been a rise in the number of mental health training programs, but they still do not inspire scientific capability. Therapies such as memory-recovery techniques, rebirthing and re-parenting may be doubtful or even dangerous according to critics of psychology.